Journal Home
Search for

Volume 141, Issue 6, Pages 701-709 (December 2009)


View previous. 11 of 33 View next.

Comparing quality at an ambulatory surgery center and a hospital-based facility: Preliminary findings

Jedidiah Grisel, MDabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Ellis Arjmand, MD, PhD, MMMb

Received 26 March 2009; received in revised form 12 August 2009; accepted 9 September 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To measure the quality of outpatient surgery in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) compared to a hospital-based facility (HBF) in a multidimensional manner.

Study Design

Cross-sectional survey based on chart review.

Setting

Pediatric academic health center.

Subjects and Methods

A total of 486 cases were reviewed. Procedures were performed at either an ASC (n = 275) or an HBF (n = 211). Cases comprised four procedure types: ventilation tube insertion (ASC, n = 126; HBF, n = 108), dental rehabilitation (ASC, n = 89; HBF, n = 58), adenotonsillectomy (ASC, n = 37; HBF, n = 34), and ventilation tube insertion/adenoidectomy (ASC, n = 23; HBF, n = 11). Measures were developed for five categories: safety, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equitability. Performance was compared between facilities.

Results

The ASC had no unexpected safety events (0/275) compared to nine events (9/211) at the HBF. Tonsil bleed rates were 0 percent (0/37) at the ASC compared to 5.9 percent (2/34) at the HBF. Patient satisfaction was similar between facilities (ASC, n = 64; HBF, n = 35). Differences in timeliness approached 30 percent. A total of 77 percent of ASC cases finished within the scheduled time compared to 38 percent at the HBF. Total charges were 12 to 23 percent less at the ASC. Patients treated at the ASC generally lived in wealthier neighborhoods.

Conclusion

Performance at the ASC generally exceeded that at the HBF. Future research should investigate how perioperative processes result in these quality differences. Health policy implications are discussed.

a Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

b Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Jedidiah Grisel, MD, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 231 Albert B. Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45229

 No sponsorships or competing interests have been disclosed for this article.

PII: S0194-5998(09)01478-8

doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.09.002


View previous. 11 of 33 View next.