Journal Home
Search for

Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages 411-414 (April 2008)


View previous. 5 of 36 View next.

Transnasal esophagoscopy: A position statement from the American Bronchoesophagological Association (ABEA)

Milan R. Amin, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gregory N. Postma, MDb, Michael Setzen, MDc, Jamie A. Koufman, MDd

Received 5 November 2007; received in revised form 12 December 2007; accepted 20 December 2007.

Objective

To review and summarize the current literature on transnasal esophagoscopy, and to compare information with conventional esophagoscopy.

Data Sources

Medline (Ovid), book chapters.

Review Methods

A thorough review of the literature using the Medline database was performed with the following search terms: esophagoscopy, transnasal esophagoscopy, ultrathin endoscopy, and esophagoscope.

Results

The literature seems to support the equivalence of transnasal esophagoscopy and conventional esophagoscopy in image quality and diagnostic capability. It also points to some potential advantages of transnasal esophagoscopy.

Conclusions

Transnasal esophagoscopy is a useful tool for accurate diagnosis and can be used in a variety of office procedures.

a Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Medical Center, New York City, NY

b Department of Otolaryngology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA

c NYU Medical Center, and the North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY

d New York Medical College, Valhalla, and the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York City, NY.

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Milan R. Amin, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, HCC Suite 3C, New York, NY 10016.

PII: S0194-5998(07)02071-2

doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.032


View previous. 5 of 36 View next.