Sunnybrook and House-Brackmann Facial Grading Systems: Intrarater repeatability and interrater agreement

Objective

To assess repeatability and agreement of the House-Brackmann (H-B FGS) and the Sunnybrook (SFGS) Facial Grading Systems.

Study design and setting

Eight video-recorded facial palsy patients were graded in 2 sittings by 28 doctors. Repeatability and agreement for SFGS were measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of repeatability (CR), and for H-B FGS by agreement percentage and kappa coefficients.

Results

Repeatability for SFGS was from good to excellent and for H-B FGS from fair to good. Agreement between doctors for SFGS was moderate by CR and nearly perfect by ICC. For H-B FGS, the agreement percentage was 50%, and generalized kappa indicated only fair agreement.

Conclusions

SFGS was at least as good in repeatability as H-B FGS and showed more reliable results in agreement between doctors.

Significance

While waiting for an ideal scale for facial grading, the usage of SFGS can be encouraged over H-B FGS.

a Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

b STAT-Consulting, Tampere, Finland.

Reprint requests: Mervi Kanerva, MD, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, POB 220, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland.

Supported in part by a grant from the Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Fund.

PII: S0194-5998(06)01380-5

doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.748

14 of 50