Nationwide survey on the use of image-guided functional endoscopic sinus surgery
Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, September 25-28, 2005.
Objective
To evaluate impressions and usage of sinus surgery image-guided surgical (IGS) systems by ENT surgeons in the United States.
Study design and setting
A survey was mailed to selected practicing ENT physicians, investigating regional information, practice type, IGS usage patterns, perceived benefits and limitations, and usage of the 61795 surgery code.
Results
Seventy-three percent of respondents use IGS. Nonusers respond that it provides no benefit or is too expensive. Eighty percent of respondents replied that IGS may allow for increased safety in certain procedures. Most users attempt reimbursement with the 61795 code.
Conclusion
IGS usage is increasing but appears to be perceived as expensive and nonbeneficial in certain situations. Most respondents, however, felt that IGS may lead to safer surgery in certain situations, including revision and frontal procedures. Several factors appear to limit routine use including ease of use, technical setup, code reimbursement, and initial purchase costs.
Significance
IGS use appears to be increasing. The most frequent users appear to agree with the previously issued AAO-HNS guidelines regarding appropriate indications. Expanded use may depend on ease of use, reimbursement, and affordability.
EBM rating: D-5
aAssociates of Otolaryngology, P.C., Denver, Colorado
bStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
cENT Surgical Consultants, LTD, Joliet, IL 60435, Joliet, Illinois
dCalifornia Sinus Institute, East Palo Alto, California.
Reprint requests: Dr Edward James Hepworth, MD, Associates of Otolaryngology, P.C., 950 E. Harvard Avenue, Suite 500, Denver, CO 80210.
1 Dr Hepworth and Dr Vaughan are consultants for Acclarent, Incorporated and GE Medical Systems.